Twenty-first century communities are not bound by time and space as communities were decades ago. Wealth, intellectual capital, natural or developed resources are often concentrated in urban areas. Moreover, locales are connected by environmental, economic, energy and public interests. Many small urban and rural communities have low-income residents, who are disconnected from essential services available in a nearby large urban center. Often population declines in these communities lead to fewer opportunities for jobs, education, and core elements necessary for desirable life quality. Rural and low-density residents proximate to anchor cities could be advantaged by improved public transportation and micro mobility options providing connection into nearby large urban areas. A recent study examined corridor linkages into Texas’ anchor (called megaregion) cities, then compared the vulnerable community characteristics with their county cohorts. The question was whether the gap between vulnerable residents in rural and small urban communities and others in their counties can be measured using demographic variables. A Composite Vulnerability Index (CVI) measures the gap for Texas Triangle and Texas’ Gulf Coast megaregion corridors confirming the poverty of selected rural residents compared to their county cohorts.